Bio-stimulation Approach in Bioremediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil Using Fish Waste and Goat Manure

Main Article Content

V. G. Awari
D. N. Ogbonna
R. R. Nrior


Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of Fish waste and Goat manure to bio-stimulate the degradation process during bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil.

Study Design: Research was designed to evaluate and compare the strength of the organic nutrients (Goat manure and fish waste)   to stimulate the biodegradation of crude oil contaminated soil within 56 days.

Place and Duration of Study: Study was carried out in Rivers State University Farm, Rivers state, Nigeria for 56 days from July to September 2018.  Analyses were carried out weekly (per 7 days interval).

Methodology:  Eight (8) experimental set-up were employed, each having 5kg farm soil, all were left fallow for 6 days before contamination with crude oil on the 7th day in the respective percentages. Four of the set-ups were contaminated with 5% Crude oil while the other four were contaminated with 10% Crude oil. The contaminated plots were further allowed for 21 days for proper contamination and exposure to natural environmental factors to mimic a crude oil spill site before the application of bio stimulating agents (fish waste and goat manure). The set-ups of 5% Crude Oil Contaminated Soil (5% COCS) and 10% Crude Oil Contaminated Soil (10% COCS) were then stimulated with nutrient organics; Goat Manure (GM) and Fish Waste (FW) except two setups (one 5% COCS and the other 10% COCS) which were used as controls. The treatments (setups) were as follows: 5% COCS    (control 1), 5% COCS + GM, 5% COCS + FW, 5% COCS + GM + FW and 10% COCS (Control 2), 10% COCS +GM, 10% COCS + FW, 10% COCS + GM + FW. Physiochemical and microbiological status of the soil before and after contamination was evaluated while parameters including Nitrate, Sulphate, Phosphate and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH), as well as Microbial analyses, were monitored throughout the experimental period. Bioremediation efficiency was estimated from percentage (%) reduction of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) from day 1 to the residual concentration at day 56 of bio-stimulation setups with the control. The bio-stimulating potentials of goat manure and fish waste were compared using statistical tools.

Results: The results revealed decrease in TPH with increasing time. The Amount (mg/kg) and Percentage (%) of Total  Petroleum  Hydrocarbon (TPH) remediated within the period of this study for 5% Crude Oil Contaminated Soil were as follows: 5% COCS-Ctrl 1 (563.52 mg/kg; 8.60%) < 5% COCS + GM (3608.84 mg/kg; 55.11%) < 5% COCS + FW (4156.49 mg/kg; 63.47%)  < 5% COCS + GM + FW (4350.69 mg/kg; 66.44%) while 10% crude oil contaminated soil were: 10% COCS-Ctrl 2 (125.71 mg/kg; 1.21%) < 10% COCS + GM (4422.75 mg/kg; 42.82%) < 10%COCS + FW (5542.16 mg/kg; 53.66%) < 10% COCS + GM + FW (6168.66 mg/kg; 59.72%). This result shows that combination treatment with goat manure and fish wasteis more effective and has more bio-stimulating potentials than the single treatments. With respect to individual bio-stimulating agent, fish waste proves more effective and had a higher bioremediation efficiency than goat manure. The results of colonial counts obtained revealed that the total heterotrophic bacterial and total fungal counts generally increased during the study across the trend. The counts obtained from day 7 to 56 in the respective experimental set ups were as follows: Total Heterotrophic Bacteria  counts increased from 6.32 to 8.20 Log10CFU/g (Control) < 6.32 to 9.05 Log10CFU/g  (COCS+FW) < 6.41 to 9.13 Log10CFU/g (COCS+GM) < 6.32 to 9.58 Log10CFU/g (COCS+FW+GM). Similar progression was observed for total fungi, hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria and hydrocarbon utilizing fungi in all the experimental set ups although irregular differences were observed in the control set ups.

Conclusion: The combination of organic nutrient such as goat manure and fish waste as bio-stimulating agents have shown to have higher percentage (%) bioremediation efficiency than when applied singly. It was also observed that the microbial biomass increased with time; moreover the nutrient monitoring analysis revealed a continuous gradual increase of the soil nutrient as bioremediation increases with time. The nutrient inherent in the bio-stimulating agents’ fish waste and goat manure resulted in increased soil nutrient (from day 7 to 56) as bioremediation period increase thereby enhancing soil nutrients at end of experiment. It is therefore recommended that bio-stimulating agents such as fish waste and goat manure should be employed in bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil especially due to its soil nutrient enhancement after bioremediation exercise. It’s a very good nutrient amendment option.

Bio-stimulation, bioremediation, crude oil contamination, fish waste, goat manure.

Article Details

How to Cite
Awari, V. G., Ogbonna, D. N., & Nrior, R. R. (2020). Bio-stimulation Approach in Bioremediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil Using Fish Waste and Goat Manure. Microbiology Research Journal International, 30(1), 33-46.
Original Research Article


Ogbonna DN. Application of biological methods in the remediation of oil polluted environment in Nigeria. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology. 2018;17(4):1-10.

Ekanem J. Nwachukwu I. Sustainable agricultural production in degraded oil producing and conflict prone communities of Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability. 2015; 8(1):14-28.

Biobasics. The science and the issues; 2006. Available: h/View.asp?x=741

Nester EW, Anderson DG, Roberts CE, Pearsall NN, Nester MT. Microbiology: A human perspective. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.

Thapa TB, Ajay-Kumar KC, Ghimire AA.Review on bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2012;8(I): 164-170.

Gilligan PH, Lum GR, Vandamme PA, Whittier SB. Stenotrophomonas, Ralstonia, Brevundimonas, Comamonas, Delftia, Pandoraea, and Acidovorax. In: Murray PR, Baron, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 8th Ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2003.

Nrior RR, Odokuma LO. Ultimate biodegradability potential of Tri-chloroethylene (TCE) used as degreaser in marine, brackish and fresh water. Journal of Environmental Sciences, Toxicology and Food Technology. 2015;9:80-89.

Mandal AK, Sarma PM, Jeyaseelan CP, Channashettar VA, Singh B, Banwari Lall, B, Datta J. Large scale bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated waste at Indian oil refineries: Case studies. International Journal of Life Sciences and Pharma Research. 2012;2(4):114- 128.

Food & Agriculture Organization. Guidelines for Soil Description. Rome: F.A.O. 4th edition. 2006;1:97.

Ogbonna DN, Isirimah NO, Princewill E. Effect of organic wastes compost and microbial activity on the growth of maize in the ultisols in Port Harcourt. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012;11(62): 12546-12554.

Nrior RR, Odokuma LO, Tete E. Ultimate Biodegradation of Industrial Detergent Used in the Upstream Sector of the Nigeria Petroleum Industry in Freshwater, Brackish and Marine Water. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology 2017;2(4):134-144.

Ogbonna DN, Ekweozor IKE, Nrior RR, Ezinwo FE. Evaluation of organic nutrient supplements and bio-augmenting micro-organisms on Crude Oil Polluted soils, Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2019;38(6):1-19.

Nrior RR, Echezolom C. Assessment of percentage bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon contaminated soil with bio-stimulating agents. Current Studies in Comparative Education, Science and Technology. 2016;3(1):203-215.

APHA. Standard methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 20th Ed. APHA-AWWA-WPCF. Washington DC; 1998.

Prescott LM, Harley JP, Klein DA. Microbiology. 6th Ed. McGraw Hill, London; 2005.

Cheesebrough M. District laboratory practices in tropical countries (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

Chikere CB, Okpokwasili GC, lchiakor O. Characterisation of hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria intropical marine sediments. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 8(11):2541-2544.

Okpokwasili GC, Amanchukwu SC. Petroleum hydrocarbon degradation by Candida species. Environmental International.1988;14:243-247.

Nrior R, Onwuka N. Bioremediation of crude oil contaminated marshland muddy soil by augumentation approach using Candida tropicalis and Penicillium chrysogenum. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT). 2017; 11(10):57-64.

Okerentugba PO, Ezeronye OU. Petroleum degrading potentials of single and mixed microbial cultures isolated from rivers and refinery effluent in Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2003;2: 288-292.

Nrior RR, Mene GB. Assessment of bio-augmentation efficiency of Penicillium chrysogenum and Aspergillus nidulans Bio remediation of crude oil spill soil. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxi-cology and Food Technology. 2017;11(8):01-09.

Wemedo SA, Nrior RR and Ike AA. Biodegradation Potential of Bacteria Isolated from Crude Oil Polluted Site in South South, Nigeria Journal of Advances in Microbiology. 2018;12(2):1-13

Ogbonna DN, Iwegbue CMI, Sokari TG, Koko ID. Effect of bioremediation on the growth of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in the Niger Delta soil. Environmentalist. 2007;27(2):303-307.