Community- based Active Tuberculosis Case Finding in Pastoralist Communities of North-Eastern Uganda

Main Article Content

Guma Isaac
Emuron John Robert
Namugambe Swabrah
Nabirye Gloria
Philip Denis Okungura
Paul Oboth
Jacob S. Iramiot
Rebecca Nekaka

Abstract

Background: Given the global urgency to improve tuberculosis (TB) case detection, a renewed interest in active case finding (ACF) has risen. Missed TB cases pose a serious threat as they continue to fuel TB transmission in the community. We aimed to assess the feasibility of community based ACF for TB among people living in a pastoralist community in Uganda and determine its impact on case detection and treatment uptake.

Methods: Between April and May 2019, four third year medical and nursing students placed at Moroto Regional Referral for community orientation worked together with community health workers to conduct a door-to-door survey for TB in pastoralist communities of Nadunget Sub County, Moroto district. The community health workers and the Medical/Nursing students performed symptom screening, collected sputum and facilitated specimen transport to the laboratory. Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay was performed at the regional referral Hospital for all sputum samples. The community health workers were tasked to follow up on all those clients whose samples turned out to be positive so that they could start treatment as soon as possible. All presumptive cases with negative sputum results were referred to the TB clinic for further evaluation.

Results: In one month, we screened 385 individuals and identified 143 aged above 15 years with symptoms suggestive of TB. Among the presumptive cases, 132 (92%) reported a cough of more than two weeks and we were able to obtain sputum samples from 84(58.7%) participants. We diagnosed 11, including 8 bacteriologically confirmed TB cases using Gene Xpert and there was no multidrug resistant case identified. The median time from sputum collection to notification of the positive result was 3 days. All the positive cases were followed up and initiated on treatment.

Conclusion: The findings from our study suggest that in a pastoralist community, ACF for TB using a sensitive symptom screen followed by Gene Xpert contributed to improved case detection of TB, shortening the turnaround time hence timely initiation of patients on TB treatment.

Keywords:
Tuberculosis, gene xpert, case finding and multidrug resistance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Isaac, G., John Robert, E., Swabrah, N., Gloria, N., Okungura, P. D., Oboth, P., Iramiot, J. S., & Nekaka, R. (2019). Community- based Active Tuberculosis Case Finding in Pastoralist Communities of North-Eastern Uganda. Microbiology Research Journal International, 29(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/mrji/2019/v29i330166
Section
Original Research Article

References

Lönnroth K, et al. Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: Rationale, definitions and key considerations State of the art series. Active case finding/screening. Number 1 in the series. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2013;17(3):289-298.

Ho J, Fox GJ, Marais BJ. Passive case finding for tuberculosis is not enough. International Journal of Mycobacteriology. 2016;5(4):374-378.

World Health Organisation. Global Tuberculosis Report; 2018.

Storla DG, Yimer S, Bjune GA. A systematic review of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):15.

Dimitrova B, et al. Health service providers' perceptions of barriers to tuberculosis care in Russia. Health Policy and Planning. 2006;21(4):265-274.

Dobler CC, Batbayar O, Wright CM. Practical challenges and solutions to TB control in a lower–middle-income country: experiences from Mongolia. Eur Respiratory Soc; 2018.

Lorent N, et al. Community-based active tuberculosis case finding in poor urban settlements of Phnom Penh, Cambodia: A feasible and effective strategy. PloS one. 2014;9(3): e92754.

Yassin MA, et al. Innovative community-based approaches doubled tuberculosis case notification and improve treatment outcome in Southern Ethiopia. PloS one. 2013;8(5):e63174.

Ministry of Health. Manual for Management and Control of Tuberculosis and Leprosy, N.T.a.L.C. Programme, Editor. Uganda; 2017.

Ministry of Health. District Health Management Information Software System version 2 (DHIS2); 2011.

Corbett EL, et al. Comparison of two active case-finding strategies for community-based diagnosis of symptomatic smear-positive tuberculosis and control of infectious tuberculosis in Harare, Zimbabwe (DETECTB): A cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet. 2010; 376(9748):1244-1253.

Ministry of Health, Uganda National TB Prevalence Survey. 2014-2015.

Organization WH. WHO guidelines on tuberculosis infection prevention and control; 2019.

Datiko DG, Lindtjørn B. Health extension workers improve tuberculosis case detection and treatment success in southern Ethiopia: a community randomized trial. PloS one. 2009;4(5): e5443.

Little KM, et al. Yield of household contact tracing for tuberculosis in rural South Africa. BMC infectious diseases. 2018; 18(1):299.

Eang MT, et al. Early detection of tuberculosis through community-based active case finding in Cambodia. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):469.

Daftary A, et al. Can community pharmacists improve tuberculosis case finding? A mixed methods intervention study in India. BMJ Global Health. 2019; 4(3):e001417.

Aye S. et al. Evaluation of a tuberculosis active case finding project in peri-urban areas, Myanmar: 2014-2016. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2018;70: 93-100.

Ayles H, et al. Effect of household and community interventions on the burden of tuberculosis in southern Africa: the ZAMSTAR community-randomised trial. The Lancet. 2013;382(9899):1183-1194.